Standard+I

(Bullet points represent comments)


 * Standard I: Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive integration of technology and foster an environment and culture conducive to the realization of that vision.**

//1. I.A. Educational leaders facilitate the shared development by all stakeholders of a vision for technology use and widely communicate that vision.// > What is the best technology model for a school our size? Are we up to date or are we far behind? Is there something we should be working towards in your opinion? What would you do to improve our current standard that is reasonable? > Your job in this transition(?) is essential in that you are the expert that can tell us what can be accomplished with what we currently own as well as give us ideas about future additions to our labs that can assist in our individual classrooms. //2. I.B. Educational leaders maintain an inclusive and cohesive process to develop, implement, and monitor a dynamic, long-range, and systemic technology plan to achieve the vision.// //3. I.C. Educational leaders foster and nurture a culture of responsible risk-taking and advocate policies promoting continuous innovation with technology.// //4. I.D. Educational leaders use data in making leadership decisions.// //5. I.E. Educational leaders advocate for research-based effective practices in use of technology.// //6. I.F. Educational leaders advocate, for policies, programs, and funding opportunities that support implementation of the technology plan.//
 * This step would involve developing a planning group to provide input and vision for a strategic plan that is realistic and useful. I guess that is us :)
 * We need to define "technology" when being used in discussions. Most will think technology is a tangible piece of hardware such as faster computers, ipads, cameras, etc. The flip side is software and how the hardware is being used and offered and also web based instructional sites. Technology can be as simple as changing teaching styles (example Lori's class this year) Does the strategic plan focus on equipment or curriculum? Throwing money at better, current equipment will do nothing if the teaching style doesn't change. Focus on specific classes or across the board? I think we need to zero in on an area to create a plan for. If it's too general I think we will wind up spinning our wheels.
 * The "technological integration" that we are constantly referring to does not necessarily mean new and improved equipment or hardware at this point. We have a tremendous amount of technology at our fingertips right now. When referring to this integration I believe (and someone jump in here if I am wrong) we are wanting the teachers to make a more conserted effort to use what is available currently and with our guidance think of ways to bring the 21st century into their indivudual classrooms.
 * The main discussions are not revolving around upgrades as of yet but more simply instruction and support to a staff that is hesitant to take this jump. Having said that, I would love to hear some of your thoughts on FUTURE upgrades of hardware and software that you or collegues of yours have seen working in educational settings. As teachers we can want and wish but reality lies in the IT professional that installs and keeps the system running smoothly.
 * I would like to see a plan that included small steps in simple language. This may include a space on Jane's at-a-glance worksheet that includes technological integration at least X times a quarter.
 * Working with administrators to develop a timetable and a budget to support technology growth in the school so that everyone has input.
 * When observing teachers, use of technology in the classroom needs to become part of the assessment of their skills and classroom managment. We have said it many times in prior posts that this needs to become an expectation of our staff.
 * By including IT and Finance in the discussions of what we are looking towards accomplishing as educators we can help determine budgetary necessities/possibilities to accomplish our educational goals.
 * I like that there may be a technology expection on the teacher's evaluation form. Since other financial information has been sent to parents and staff, I believe that the technology fees budget should be made available, too.
 * A budget of the tech money would be nice to see.
 * Brainstorm possible strategies to raise the level of desire to integrate technology into content areas and develop training program.
 * I think the results of the survey should help us brainstorm strategies. Maybe those who do not use or desire to use the hardware/software available should be interviewed for more input especially following the inservices in June.
 * If the Title II money was spread and conferences were "strongly recommended" to teachers I think we would see more because the faculty would be exposed to the possibilities.
 * Use the survey results compiled.
 * Provide opportunities to attend conferences and workshops where tech. integration issues are addressed. Find ways to share these opportunities with all faculty.
 * We are doing this! Yeah :) June 1, 2 and 3rd will be great and I am doing a series of workshops at the academy starting next week for those who need to get up to date.
 * The inservice opportunities will help and I liked Lori's suggestion at our meeting to use some of the technology fee for conferences if Title II funds won't cover. Maybe Title II funds for the 2011-12 year should be focused on technology integration in the classroom.
 * I do suggest we limit 2-3 presentations at inservice; last year, there were too many and that overwhelms some. Do we know how many of those have been implemented by teachers and by whom?
 * I would like to see tech conferences chosen by the administration and teachers directed to certain conferences (ie- here are three on tech in math, pick one and attend).
 * Jenny Egen had a great ideas as well that each teacher would get a week to present something they did in their classroom to integrate technology. Kind of like we do with devotions. We all get a turn throughout the year.
 * Most professional organizations are encouraging integrating more technology. Perhaps if we sought to gain ideas and financial support for more faculty joining their professional organizations.
 * I am learning quickly about grants that are available for a multitude of educational applications including technology.
 * Networking within professional organizations is a great wat to hear about financial potential as well as find people to collaborate with in order to secure grants.
 * I believe professional organizations are important. For those who would have a difficult time paying, would RLS pay for them to join one?